The weathered St. Martin's German Evangelical Church stands as a proud reminder of Sedamsville's heyday, when the neighborhood bustled with German and Irish immigrants and a thriving business district.
But the High Victorian Gothic-style church, designed by Emil Baude and built in 1892, will soon face the wrecking ball.
Developer Arlon (Ray) Brown of Collins Riverside Development LLC had applied for a demolition permit to tear down the landmark to make way for his proposed $50 million Harbor Lights condominium project.
Since mid-2007, Brown has been purchasing property between 2500 and 2900 River Road under both his name and under the name of Collins Riverside Development LLC, often for much more than the properties are worth.
Harbor Lights would require the demolition of up to 30 Sedamsville properties - 12 in the initial phases.
In April, Susan Feldman, co-chair of the Sedamsville Historic Committee, asked City Council to delay demolitions in the subject area until a historic district proposal could be reviewed by the Ohio Historic Site Preservation Advisory Board as part of a process to have it placed on the National Register of Historic Places.
In a May report to City Council, City Manager Milton Dohoney Jr. said that there's little the City can do to stop the demolitions.
Because the properties in the redevelopment area are not located within a local historic district, demolitions will not have to be reviewed by the City's Historic Conservation Office during the permit process.
"If demolition permits are filed, the City would be obligated to consider the applications without regard to historical significance," Dohoney wrote.
However, listing on the National Register could make future work on Harbor Lights ineligible for federal funds.
"The city's really hungry for development," Feldman says. "But there are vacant buildings everywhere. What's wrong with preserving the structures that are already on the hillside?"
'It would be like losing a family member'
The stately St. Martin's is widely considered the centerpiece of the proposed Sedamsville River Road Historic District, which includes 58 properties on the northwest side of River Road and southwest of Ansonia Avenue.
The two-story, central-aisle red brick church is capped with a 125-foot steeple and, above an eight light wheel window, a sandstone plaque reads "DEUTCHE VER. EV. PROT. MARTINI KIRCHE A.D. 1892."
Built for just $24,000, it could seat 375 people.
The church has been vacant for nearly three decades and, until Brown purchased it, had been on sale since April 2005.
Feldman can't imagine what its loss would mean to the community.
"It would be like losing a family member," she says. "Like losing an icon. The loss of the landmark would be incredibly significant."
And she says that it's part of a well-orchestrated plan laid out by people who don't live in Sedamsville, and don't care about the community.
"None of the human factor enters into this with the developers," she says. "There are a lot of people all around Cincinnati that have roots that trace back here. And the church itself...peoples' babies were baptized here, people were married here."
Now that the historic district is well on its way to making the National Register, Feldman firmly believes that the demolition is being done out of spite.
"I believe he's trying to beat the clock before the historic district is finalized," she says. "We're only three weeks out from the state hearing, and he's already taken out a demolition permit."
Feldman adds that the demolition permit is viewed by historians and residents as "becoming uglier and more depressing with the impression that the developer will rapidly progress with demolition to foil the listing".
State agrees its historic
On July 21, the City's Historic Conservation Board recommended approval of the Sedamsville River Road Historic District.
On August 1, the Ohio Historic Site Preservation Advisory Board met in Columbus on August 1 to the district and 15 other properties and districts from throughout the state.
To the Sedamsville representatives' surprise, Brown appeared at the hearing with Cincinnati City Councilmember John Cranley - ostensibly one of his development partners.
Feldman questions why Cranley was there as a representative of the City, since the Historic Conservation Board had already given de facto City approval by recommending the nomination.
"I just thought...we're you're contituents, not the developer," she says. "You're supposed to be there to represent us."
While most of the 16 items on the state's agenda were discussed and passed within 10 minutes, discussion of the Sedamsville district lasted more than an hour and a half.
Feldman says that Brown and Cranley wanted to table the historic district proposal until Harbor Lights was approved.
"The board was wonderful at getting back to the subject at hand," she says. "Cranley appeared to know very little about the nomination or its process. The Chair and several members of the board stated that their role was to decide whether the district met the criteria for listing in the National Register. Their role was not to decide whether a developer has plans to demolish or construct new buildings."
Feldman sent letters regarding Cranley's behavior at the hearing both to Mayor Mark Mallory and to Vice Mayor David Crowley.
In his response, Crowley says that it's his understanding that Cranley was representing himself as a private citizen, and therefore "has the privilege of expressing his opinions".
Mayor Mallory has yet to respond.
The state board eventually voted 8-1 to recommend the district for nomination to the National Register.
Gearing up
Barbara Powers, department head of inventory & registration for the Ohio Historical Society Historic Preservation Office, presented the proposal and has promised that the Sedamsville proposal will be the first one she picks up after her return from vacation.
"She did a walking tour with us in March, and we made her aware of the Brown factor," Feldman says. "Both the City and state have recommended that we shorten the district. We're all geared up for whatever changes need to be made."
After the changes are made, it will be sent on to the Secretary of the Interior, who will forward it to the Keeper of the National Register.
Meanwhile, Brown is now approaching people on the 2400 block of River Road and offering them more than their properties are worth, plus signing bonuses.
And so far, he has torn down four structures.
Feldman says that she and other concerned neighbors will continue to watch and make sure that too many structures aren't torn down.
"It smells of Norwood," she says. "I call this a 'kept' secret, because I hate to use the word 'best'. No one has seen the plans. They've gobbled up our whole neighborhood, and they did it very secretly."
Feldman disputes Brown's claims to the state board that the whole neighborhood is behind him.
"The Sedamsville Civic Association has voted to send a letter of approval to the City once they saw the development plans," she says. "So far, that hasn't happened."
In the meantime, Feldman will continue to do whatever it takes to fight for her community.
"We're going to stay optimistic," she says. "We can't leave any stone unturned at this point."
Despite all of the emotionally-draining work, Feldman continues to enjoy life on the hillside.
"I can't tell you what a wonderful life it's provided us," she says. "I've never felt like I needed more."
Photo credit: Urban Ohio
Previous reading on BC:
City has little say in Sedamsville demolitions (5/14/08)
Sedamsville wants demo delay on possible condo project (4/17/08)
Friday, August 22, 2008
Centerpiece of historic Sedamsville threatened
Posted by
Kevin LeMaster
at
5:10 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)








12 comments:
Nobody knows better what's right for you than Councilman Cranley. Ask the streetcar boosters.
i hate seeing buildings like this brought down. even if there is no market, i still hate it. they don't build 'em like this anymore.
This is a tragedy in the making. Although I've only been a resident for 18 months, I'm beginning to believe that the city government is ripe with corruption when it comes to development. Inept would be too mild a term.
The recently deceased Carolyn Pitts, a Philadelphia-based architectural historian worked tirelessly to preserve the beautiful New Jersey shore town of Cape May. When that city's leaders were ready to tear down all of its historic Victorian structures and replace them with 1970s concrete motels, she pretty much went behind their backs and got the entire town designated as a historic landmark. They were not pleased.
Since that time, Cape May has become one of the most visited and desirable tourist locations on the eastern seaboard. The place is magical -- precisely because it embraced its past before it was too late.
I hope someday the city of Cincinnati will have an advocate as strong and smart as Carolyn.
There is an obituary for Carolyn here: http://bit.ly/3h1BCo that briefly outlines her honorable struggle to save Cape May from an ugly future.
I sure wish Cincinnati could have a smart, strong, and effective advocate like Carolyn before it is too late if it is not already.
.....Before it turns into Habitatanati where the bar has fallen so low for good design.
Why not use the church as the center piece of the development? Could this church be turned into condominiums? Is it in that bad of shape?
The city should help in some way. It should be a positive force and work with the developer rather than letting a developer decide the fate of significant buildings.
This building has been under a condemnation order since 2004.
There's no doubt it was gorgeous in it's day, and could be again with some love and a lot of money. But people who invest that kind of dough want a hefty return. And that's a very risky bet in a distressed neighborhood.
There are a fair number of investors who buy and hold such properties, waiting decades for a neighborhood to get popular again. Then they sell to a developer or rehabber and recoup all those years of wasted property taxes from the big capital gain. The Eastern Ave corridor was recently redeveloped this way.
But the City has grown tired of waiting and strengthened its vacated buildings maintenance license (VBML) to force action. You can read all about that in the last 2 editions of the Business Courier.
It's working; stunningly well, or tragically, depending on your point of view. A lot of potentially beautiful old buildings wind up in landfills, but a lot of renewal happens too. And for a city whose biggest problems are stagnant population & tax base, and out-of-date housing stock, that has its advantages.
This old church will soon become a casualty of that approach. And the rest of Sedamsville won't be far behind. Then we'll have to decide whether the glitzy new condos were worth the cost. Something tells me our politicians will appreciate the new tax revenue much more than the old buildings. Keep that in mind when you look to government for answers.
That church, when seen from the river makes a great impression, set amonst the hills. It woudl be a shame to lose it.
In any other city, a developer would bend over backwards to preserve the historic buildings and incorporate them into the new development. That cathedral and perhaps some of the other buildings would serve as a real selling point, especially if residents could walk to them for activities or whatever. In any other city, this concept would be a no-brainer.
But here in Cincinnati ??? The developer probably wants to do a development that resembles something in West Chester from the 90's. And only in Cincinnati are there next to no barriers to demolishing some of our most important landmarks.
AND WHO'S GOING TO BUY HIGH END CONDOS ON THE RIVER WEST OF DOWNTOWN ???
When I first moved here from the East Coast I was blown away by the wealth of historic buildings in this town. But then I have since been equally horrified by how easily people can just tear them down... ...and when a developer can't tear them down, he busts out the windows, punches some holes in the roof, waits 5 years, and then reapplies for the demo permit citing that the structure is about to collapse.
If a developer tried this in NYC or Boston, he'd be run out of town. In this town, he gets the key to the city, while Mallory PRETENDS not to understand the problem.
It'll be a real shame if Sedamsville loses this lovely, historic landmark.
Anonymous who wrote:
"If a developer tried this in NYC or Boston, he'd be run out of town. In this town, he gets the key to the city..."
You are dead-on. This city has so much potential -- but I don't think it will ever live up to it.
It's very sad, and very frustrating -- particularly when you live on the west side of town. If it weren't for our incredible neighbors, we'd be long gone.
Say goodbye to the church because they just finished tearing down the back side of it. I live 5 doors down from it. Tomorrow they will probably finish off the bell tower.
Has anyone taken a look at the 2400 block lately. The structures that have been taken down have had no historical value what so ever, including the church. I have lived on the west side my whole life, and never seen a more exciting project. We are not in Jersey, Manhattan, or Boston. The west side has been needing something like this for a long time. I wish people would get the facts straight before they talk.
^ I think people would like to get their facts straight, if they could get some facts. Where is the development plan? Why can't the people of Sedamsville see it?
Post a Comment