Monday, March 14, 2011

Weekly Abandoned/Vacant Building Report, 3/14/11

Abandoned/Vacant building count

Total as of March 3, 2011: 4,908 buildings
% Change in past month: +1.9%
% Change in past six months: +6.3%
% Change in past year: +15.0%
% Change in past two years: +49.4%
% Change in past five years: +174.7%


Buildings demolished in the past 30 days

  • , College Hill (single-family, 1910). Public nuisance demolition.
  • , Carthage (two-family, 1885). Razed by adjacent New Jerusalem Baptist Church, which purchased the property in October 2010. No code violations.
  • , Northside (warehouse, 1939). Vacant and dilapidated, razed by owner City of Cincinnati and likely to be incorporated into the Factory Square development.
  • , Avondale (commercial, 1928). Razed by Uptown Consortium and Building Value for a planned mixed-use redevelopment.
  • , Oakley (single-family, 1925). Razed by the City of Cincinnati to make way for the Kennedy Connector road project.
  • , Oakley (single-family, 1924). Razed by the City of Cincinnati to make way for the Kennedy Connector road project.
  • , Downtown (commercial, 1929). Razed by Rock Gaming LLC as part of the Horseshoe Casino Cincinnati project.
  • , Avondale (single-family, 1900). Public nuisance demolition.
  • , South Fairmount (single-family, 1915). Public nuisance demolition.
  • , Downtown (warehouse, 1927). Razed by Rock Gaming LLC as part of the Horseshoe Casino Cincinnati project.
  • , South Fairmount (two-family, 1900). Public nuisance demolition.
  • , Oakley (two-family, 1926). Razed by the City of Cincinnati to make way for the Kennedy Connector road project.
  • , Oakley (two-family, 1924). Razed by the City of Cincinnati to make way for the Kennedy Connector road project.
  • , East Price Hill (multi-family, 1885). Public nuisance demolition.
  • , Columbia Tusculum (single-family, 1900). Public nuisance demolition due to a fire that occurred on February 5, 2010.
  • , Millvale (single-family, 1899). Public nuisance demolition.
  • , Millvale (single-family, 1910). Public nuisance demolition.

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

The image at the ham. co. auditor site looks like potential for a Thomas Kincade painting of a cottage.
Foreclosure? Yes. Probably another victim of death then abandonment - easier for the city to take the house and tear it down than to take the house and sell it. Does it make sense that the city can TAKE a property and tear it down but they can not TAKE a house and sell it?
At least the land could become part of the zoo eventually.

Recent Comments